There is no denying it. We are an unequal society. We are not equal before the law, before the governors and before the media. We are not one people. We are not one nation. We are a collection of groups of differing size with our champions and detractors in positions of power, influence and notoriety. That is plain and simple.
Once again, to clarify. The TDL Times does not support violence of any kind and those who do riot and cause criminal damage or assault or intimidation should face the full force of the law, equally.
The Two-Tier system that we mean isn’t racial. It isn’t religious. It is identitarian though. The country we are in is subscribed to the erosion of one people defined in a nation; we have seen a long denigration of this country, its people and its culture in favour of an international leftist view of oppressors and oppressed. We are run by lawyers who prefer to see international views on law and rights triumph over national norms, successes and harmony.
This all started in history, after World War 2. The world made the worst mistake of all when it comes to history. It learned only one lesson. The lesson the world learned was that racial imperialism was wrong, abhorrent and quite rightly a crime against humanity. The world collectively learned the lessons of Nazism. Crucially that was just one of the lessons. The one we didn’t learn was the awful issue of Communism. We did not learn the other lesson that a rigid ideology rooted in the destruction of one international identity due to notions of power and oppression only leads to gulags and death. The Soviet Union got a free pass and became a bastion of international law.
What do we mean by international law? Observe the founders of the concept of universal human rights. Look at the UN archives to see the nations that sponsor universal human rights we parrot again to this day. They all come from the Soviet bloc. Human rights used to surround the protection of the individual from the state. Now, human rights mean protecting the minority from the majority. The universal human rights we know now are built to destroy nations and to raise the profile of identity and the struggle between the oppressor and the oppressed. Nowhere is this more obvious than the rule of lawyers we have in this country and around the world. No longer do people within nations matter, it is about whether a group of people based on an identity that is decided to be an oppressed group feel oppressed or not; and if they do they are entitled to whatever they like.
After years of naively thinking that human rights were raising the status of the individual we learned time and time again that law was no longer being applied fairly and to individuals; it applied differently depending on your identity group. No more has that been present than in a country where national identity didn’t tend to mean very much. Abroad you are British but at home you are English, Scottish, Welsh or Northern Irish. Similarly, no one bats an eye lid in civil society in the UK if you are Black-English or A British Asian or a British Afro-Caribbean person. Quite rightly, that doesn’t matter. The ‘Anglo-Saxon’ element was only really relevant when it was a majority of around 99% which it was until 1948, but even then we have always been a multi-national entity.
And so thus in this country it is far, far easier to create different groups, different communities, because the notion of ‘being British/English/etc’ is not exclusive when living in this country. Despite historical revisionists saying it’s all due to the British Empire, it isn’t. It’s to do with our uniting principle always being values first, the monarch second, parliament third, our institutions of law, order and our historical monuments fourth, and race does not come into it. Why else do you think we have never had a serious Nazi element in this country? Why has the BNP and EDL always remained on the tiny fringes of society? This country has never seen itself as one based on an exclusive race within the population of this country.
And yet now, race is all we talk about. Why? Despite our massive success internationalism walked in with the American-Liberal focus on race being an intrinsic part of people’s identity, mixed with the universal human rights aspect which affords seemingly oppressed groups with more rights than others and the result is the Equalities Act 2010. This act enshrined in law the fact that groups within society are afforded greater legal protections, opening the door to positive discrimination, the explosion of political correctness and the broad definition of hate speech. What also walked through the door after that was different tax rules for certain minorities and it led to the clear division of societies. Just look, for example, at the laws on marriage tax breaks. For the indigenous Brit, you are allowed to be married to one person and only you two are allowed to benefit from certain tax breaks. For those in Islamic communities that is extended to all of your wives. It is illegal, quite rightly, to marry your cousin in this country (one of the great successes), it is legal in an Islamic community.
It is not right, in many ways, to single out Islam but it is a potent example of the differences simply because of the optics. As British people are carted off to special courts for sentencing days after assaulting policemen (quite rightly), the Manchester airport attacker (of Muslim origin) of the policemen has yet to be charged despite the incident happening over 2 weeks ago. Child sexual abuse gangs, an overwhelming majority from Pakistani-Muslim communities, were allowed to continue their exploitation of over 1,400 girls in Rotherham, Rochdale and other northern towns for over 30 years due to being afraid to be seen as racist. As the government talks about clamping down on social media use after the recent riots nothing, literally nothing, was done after the murder of over 40 young people at the Miles Cyrus concert a few years ago, or the murder of MP David Amess by an Islamic terrorist. The optics just don’t look good, though this should by no means denigrate Islam - for one it has different interpretations and secondly Islam is not a race, nor is it in some instances a religion but a way of life. We must not get hung up on it and not scapegoat, but instead use this as example of difference in treatment from the authorities.
And we finally come to the crux of the matter. Communities. Separate communities with separate community leaders. These used to be our elected representatives in parliament and in councils; now they are self-appointed people high up in their local non-British communities that politicians from the left bow down to (see Angela Rayner pleading with Muslim community leaders for their vote during the General Election - not one woman could be seen). Whilst the white working class communities used to be represented by the Labour Party they are no longer represented by anybody in positions of power as community leaders who don’t like them inform the police and politicians what to do (see the head of Midlands police precincts give the Islamic greeting before addressing the camera). We see there are widely different communities with widely different views on each other’s community.
We see the differences before our eyes. So why do we assume these communities are policed differently? We have just outlined how the law differs when it comes to each community. We see the communities treated differently in the press. We see the communities represented differently or not at all. We see people with different flags and we see the response of the government violently differing depending on the news story (less said about the disgusting mainstream media the better). There is a difference within our society and it is ingrained in our laws and in our so-called representatives.
The people who need to sort this out immediately is the government. They are the only link that represents people in England in any meaningful way (as opposed to the separate devolved administrations in the other nations). The Labour Party used to represent the white working class man and woman. They have demonstrated since these riots that they do not care and will use their money to especially protect mosques instead. They need to drastically reverse course and show even-handedness even if it looks bad to the media. They need to condemn all violence and all intimidation. They need to end awful chanting including genocidal chants about Israel. They need to make living in this country fair for all before the law and they need to end the rule of lawyers and reinstall the rule of the people.
Policing speech is incredibly dangerous as if you are not even-handed then it can escalate tensions even more greatly, so don’t do it. If you need to police speech you acknowledge you have either lost the argument or you are absolving responsibility of speech in this country to censors and not to individuals and the people in power to represent all voices of opinion and for the most supported opinions to win the day with deference to your vanquished foes. If you broaden the definition of Islamophobia for example and minimise the ability to share posts/videos online then you further entrench the two-tier system.
Keir Starmer is a lawyer. Sue Gray, one of his top team, was head of the Department of Propriety and Ethics that she made, an organisation that keeps tabs on everyone in the country for what they say and do. Ollie Robbins, another in his top team, was an executive of a private investigation firm of ex-MI6 operatives. Our leaders are clearly going to enforce a new kind of a police state, at least that is the optics of what is going on. These riots are only making them more emboldened.
As no petty crime in London has been solved in over 3 years people are being arrested in their homes for Facebook comments seen as insensitive. As police run away from minority riots in Leeds they set the dogs on protestors in Plymouth. As the hard left scream Fascism their champions look to silence speech and to lock up dissidents against their proscribed friends. The two-tier society has existed for a long time, unreported and unscrutinised by our media class. Now it is out in the open.
Please, do not riot, but do speak up. Please, don’t assault our policemen, but demand the law be applied equally. Please, do not lose faith in our democracy, but argue that democracy should better reflect the will of the people. Please, don’t be an enemy of the law, but don’t let the law be an enemy of freedom, decency and you.
This affects all of us, no matter what side we are on. The more freedom you sacrifice the more likely that you are next on the list.
This article first appeared on the TDL Times. For more information, articles and more please visit www.thetdltimes.com.
Comments